The review process plays a pivotal role in the publication of an article. It assists the editor in making informed decisions and provides the author with valuable feedback to enhance the manuscript. Our journal employs a double-masked peer review system to ensure fairness and follow the COPE guidelines.
Before accepting a review assignment
Reviewers are encouraged to verify that:
- The manuscript aligns with their area of expertise.
- They can dedicate sufficient time to conduct a comprehensive and constructive review.
Basic principles for peer reviewers
When serving as a peer reviewer, it is important to adhere to the following constructive guidelines:
- Only agree to review manuscripts in your expertise and strive to provide timely assessments.
- Respect confidentiality throughout the review process and refrain from disclosing any details of the manuscript.
- Refrain from using any information obtained during the peer-review process for personal gain or to discredit others.
- Disclose any potential conflicting interests and seek advice if uncertain.
- Provide objective and constructive feedback, avoiding influence based on the manuscript's origins or the authors' characteristics.
- Offer feedback professionally and encouragingly, avoiding hostile or derogatory comments.
Preparing Review Reports
When preparing the report, it's essential to ensure the following:
- The report should provide constructive, accurate, objective, and unambiguous feedback, supported by facts and constructive arguments regarding the manuscript's content.
- Reviewers should use respectful and professional language.
- Focus on necessary corrections and clear suggestions for improvements.
During Review Process
Consider the following aspects constructively during the review process:
- Originality: Look for fresh and innovative ideas in the manuscript.
- Contribution to the field: Evaluate the manuscript's enrichment of existing knowledge and addressing of research gaps.
- Technical quality: Assess methodological rigor and data accuracy.
- Clarity of presentation: Ensure the manuscript's organization and coherence.
- Depth of research: Evaluate the study's thoroughness and support of conclusions.
Recommendations
Reviewers' recommendations should fall into one of the following categories:
- Accept: The manuscript is suitable for publication.
- Minor Corrections: Minor adjustments are needed before publication.
- Major Revision: Significant changes are required for reconsideration.
- Reject: The manuscript is not suitable for publication in its current form.