Integrating Blue-Green-Grey Open Space Network: Sustainable Urban Design Approach for Climate Change Resilience

Authors:

  • Nayma Khan
  • Qazi Azizul Mowla
  • Md. Tariquzzaman
  • Nayna Tabassum

Keywords:

  • Climate Change,
  • Inter-scalar,
  • Open Space,
  • Resilience,
  • Disaster Risk Management,
  • Green-Blue-Grey Network,

Abstract

To reduce the vulnerable impacts of climate change, it is now important to identify a climate-change adaptation or resilience strategy that would reduce the hazard risk in urban areas from possible climate change-induced flooding, temperature rise, sea-level rise, landslides, and earthquakes. In an urban area, open spaces can build the risk management capacity of urban areas. Based on their multi-functional capability, different types of open spaces are used for different functions, including spaces for recreation and relaxation, agriculture and gardening, ventilation and cooling, water absorption and groundwater recharge, and stationary or traffic and transportation for the public. It has been observed that traditionally, a network of Green-Blue-Grey (GBG) spaces provided the necessary safety net to hazards. GBG is ecosystem-based hybrid approaches that take advantage of ecosystem functions and the efficacy of more engineered systems to deliver the adaptive measure of urban design. Through case studies and literature review, this paper attempts to identify the vulnerabilities of possible climate change-induced hazards and identify types and patterns of distribution of open spaces to mitigate the risk and explore their role in making climate change resilient urban areas besides their traditional use. The literature of global scenario also shows that open space networking in an urban area can create a cost-effective climate-change adaptation/resilience approach for urban design. This paper highlights a hybrid approach that integrates the green, blue, and grey open space as an effective, sustainable strategy for climate change adaptation and hazard risk reduction approaches in the urban context.

DOI

DOI not available

References

  • Albers, R.A.W., Bosch, P.R., Blocken, B.J.E., Dobbelsteen, A.A.J.F., Hove, van, L.W.A., Spit, T.J.M., Ven, van de, F., van Hooff, T. and Rovers, V., 2015, 'Overview of challenges and achievements in the climate adaptation of cities and in the Climate Proof Cities program', Building and Environment, vol. 83, pp. 1-10.
  • Allan, P. and Brytan, M., 2010. The critical role of open space in earthquake recovery: a case study. In: Proceedings of the 2010 NZSEE Conference. [online] Available at: <(http://db.nzsee.org.nz/2010/Paper34.pdf> [Accessed 1 November 2019].
  • Aronsson-Storrier, M., 2019. UN Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (2018). Yearbook of International Disaster Law Online, 1(1), pp.314-318.
  • Bentrup, G., 2008. Conservation Buffers-Design guidelines for buffers, corridors, and greenways. Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS-109. Asheville, NC: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station. pp. 109-110.
  • Burby, R. J, and Steven, P. F, 1981. Coping with floods: the land use management paradox, Journal of the American Planning Association, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 289-300.
  • Carmona, M., 2010. Contemporary Public Space: Critique and Classification, Part One: Critique. Journal of Urban Design, 15(1), pp.123-148.
  • Cheng, C., Yang, Y., Ryan, R., Yu, Q. and Brabec, E., 2017. Assessing climate change-induced flooding mitigation for adaptation in Boston's Charles River watershed, USA. Landscape and Urban Planning, 167, pp.25-36.
  • Cranz, G., 1982. The politics of park design: A history of urban parks in America. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Cruden, D., 1991. A simple definition of a landslide. Bulletin of the International Association of Engineering Geology, 43(1), pp.27-29.
  • Dai, F.C., Lee, C.F., and Ngai, Y.Y., 2002. Landslide risk assessment and management: an overview. Engineering Geology, 64(1), pp.65-87.
  • Demuzere, M., Orru, K., Heidrich, O., Olazabal, E., Geneletti, D., Orru, H., ... & Faehnle, M., 2014. Mitigating and adapting to climate change: Multi-functional and multi-scale assessment of green urban infrastructure. Journal of environmental management, 146, pp.107-115.
  • Depietri, Y. and McPhearson, T., 2017. Integrating the grey, green, and blue in cities: nature-based solutions for climate change adaptation and risk reduction. In: N. Kabisch, H. Korn, J. Stadler and A. Bonn, ed., Nature-based solutions to climate change Adaptation in urban areas. Springer, Cham, pp.91-109.
  • RAJUK, MOHPW, GoB, 2015. Dhaka Structure Plan (2016—2035): Preserving Open Space for Recreation, Livability And Identity. Dhaka: Dhaka Metropolitan Development Planning Rajdhani Unnayan Kartripakkha., pp.10-1 -10-8.
  • EPA, U., 2006. Wetlands: Protecting Life and Property from Flooding. [online] Available at: [Accessed 15 November 2019].
  • Foster, J., Lowe, A. and Winkelman, S., 2011. The value of green infrastructure for urban climate adaptation. [online] Center for Clean Air Policy, pp.1-52.
  • Fritz, H. M. & Blount, C. D., 2006. Thematic paper: Role of forests and trees in protecting coastal areas against cyclones. In: Proceedings of the Regional Technical Workshop, Coastal protection in the aftermath of the Indian Ocean tsunami: What role for forests and trees? Khao Lak, Thailand, 28-31 August 2006.
  • Fuentes, C. W. and Tastes, M. T. R., 2015. The role of open space for urban resilience: A case study of San Pedro de la Paz under the context of the 2010 earthquake in Chile. In: the Proceedings of the 7th international i-Rec Conference 2015: Reconstruction and Recovery in Urban Contexts. [online] http://www.grif.umontreal.ca/i- rec/i-Rec2015/RT3A_12_Wirsching%20Fuentes%20 et%20al_The%20Role%20of%20Open%20Space.pdf
Volume Cover
Preview
Read / Download Paper (PDF)

Published:
2021-10-26

View XML
Logo

DEPARTMENT OF ARCHITECTURE

BANGLADESH UNIVERSITY OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY

ISSN NO. 2789-4185 (Print)

ISSN NO. 2789-4193 (Online)

Developed & Maintained by Ashik Mahmud